Large organizations select and use performance
measurement systems to determine whether they
are fulfilling their vision, meeting their
short-term objectives and achieving their
long-term, strategic goals. The measures focus
on a critical few that link directly to the
company’s strategic plan, and are a combination
of financial and non-financial indicators.
Some financial performance measurements are
historical, whereas non-financial performance
indicators allow an organization to review
its performance in real time and implement
immediate adjustments. In any case, the specific
indicators selected should best represent
the factors that lead to improved customer,
operational and financial performance.
Today, many companies are using a relatively
new approach to strategic management developed
by Drs. Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton
of the Balanced Scorecard Collaborative, Inc.
The “Balanced Scorecard” system is a management
system that enables organizations to clarify
their vision and strategy and translate them
into action.
With a properly deployed and automated balanced
scorecard approach, each management level
can monitor the key performance measures within
their control and responsibility, and understand
the relationship to the overall success of
their company. This approach provides management
with visibility into the operations and issues
of each business unit. It enables management
to implement and track key initiatives for
the purpose of addressing problem areas earlier
or pursuing additional business opportunities
faster and more effectively.
A good example of Putting Performance Measurement
to Work may be found in Subaru-Isuzu Automotive,
Inc., a joint Japanese automotive manufacturing
venture between Fuji Heavy Industries and
Isuzu Motors Limited.
In 1996, Subaru-Isuzu became conscious of
the fact that that they were using only historical
data measures to judge the venture’s overall
performance. They realized that they had only
vague goals and objectives to drive current
and future growth. They were unable to effectively
forecast targets and objectives for one, three,
five and ten year plans. In 1998, the official
decision was made to implement the balanced
scorecard approach to performance measurement
– a system designed in such a manner that
the measures selected would actually support
organizational goals and objectives.
The next step was to decide what needed to
be measured, the frequency of measurement
and finally, what type of system was needed
to maintain and display the performance trends.
After juggling numerous ideas on what needed
to be measured, it was concluded that too
many measures would likely create an unmanageable
data overload. So, a decision was made to
use the Malcom Baldrige National Quality Award
criteria. This way, “approved” performance
measures could be categorized under one of
seven business performance objectives. The
objectives include leadership, strategic planning,
customer and market focus, information and
analysis, human resource focus, project management
and results. Subaru/Isuzu ultimately reduced
the seven down to five major categories that
best represented the venture’s key business
performance goals.
Now, for the logistical end of the deal –
How could Subaru/Isuzu provide a one-stop,
easy to use, data management and measurement
system for their end users that included security
for sensitive data? It was also essential
to find a system that would allow the organization
to measure performance data against one another,
so that the trends in one performance measure
might help predict how another performance
measure would react to change. To this end,
the venture considered all the applications
programs currently being used in house (Excel,
Paradox and Access). None of these were acceptable
to management. Subaru Isuzu selected pbviews
to satisfy the perceived system criterion
and to ultimately maintain and display the
balanced scorecard.
While it is still early in the process, Subaru
Isuzu has identified numerous areas for improvement.
According to Mr. Brent Lank, Senior Business
Performance Specialist, “By far, the best
success so far is working toward having all
necessary data in one system in one location.
We wasted countless hours and dollars ‘browsing’
for reports in our network, calling people
for data, etc.”
Subaru Isuzu is now forecasting
targets and objectives for one, three, five,
and ten year plans based on this system of
measurements. Lank went on to say, “This is
truly a revolutionary change for our organization”.